Rawbbit vs Amplitude: A Different Kind of Analytics Tool

Amplitude is a hosted product analytics platform. Rawbbit is a self-hosted raw event pipeline. They solve different problems — here's how to tell which one fits.

If you've been looking at Amplitude and at self-hosted setups in the same browser session, you've probably noticed they don't quite match up. That's not an accident. They sit in different categories of tool.

This page is not a feature-by-feature scoreboard. Amplitude has years of product-analytics UI work behind it — cohort builders, funnels, retention dashboards, experimentation tools. Trying to match those one-for-one with a self-hosted pipeline misses the point.

Instead, this page covers what's actually different: the architecture, where the data lives, who owns the raw layer, and how to decide which approach fits your team.

Two fundamentally different products

Amplitude is a hosted product analytics platform. You send events to Amplitude's servers; their backend stores, processes, and aggregates them; you query through their web UI and a SQL-like interface they call Amplitude SQL. The platform optimizes for the analyst experience: visual cohort builders, drag-and-drop funnels, prebuilt retention views.

Rawbbit is a self-hosted raw event pipeline. You stand up the stack — collector, message broker, raw writer — inside your own cloud account. Events arrive over HTTP, get buffered through NATS JetStream, and land as partitioned Parquet files in object storage you control. From there, you query through your own warehouse layer (BigQuery external tables, or any tool that reads Parquet) and use any BI you already have.

These are complementary, not competing, in many real setups. Some teams run Rawbbit as the canonical raw layer and forward a subset of events into Amplitude for the product team. Others use one or the other but not both. The right question isn't "Rawbbit instead of Amplitude" — it's "which one does the job I actually need."

Architectural differences

Where each system draws its boundaries, and where your data physically lives.

Architectural differences between Rawbbit and Amplitude
Dimension Rawbbit Amplitude
Deployment model Self-hosted. Pipeline components run as Docker containers inside your cloud account. Hosted SaaS. Events go to Amplitude's infrastructure; you have no control over the pipeline runtime.
Where raw events live In your object storage (GCS or any S3-compatible backend like SeaweedFS). Raw Parquet files are yours from the moment they land. On Amplitude's servers. You can export, but raw export is a feature gated to higher tiers.
Data format Apache Parquet, partitioned by date. Open format, readable by any modern warehouse, lake engine, or DataFrame library. Amplitude's internal representation. Export gives you a defined export format, not portable raw events.
Query surface BigQuery external tables over the raw Parquet layer. Standard SQL, your choice of BI tool (Metabase, Superset, anything that talks to BigQuery). Amplitude UI plus Amplitude SQL. Tightly coupled to the platform.
Schema control Schema lives in your code. Validation happens at the collector layer; storage is schema-on-read for raw, schema-on-write for any modeled tables. Schema lives in Amplitude. Changes propagate through their data governance layer.
Vendor lock-in Low. Raw Parquet files are yours by definition. The pipeline is open source under Apache 2.0. Moderate to high. Event history is in Amplitude's hands; migration requires negotiated export.
Operational ownership You operate the pipeline. Rawbbit provides the components and setup; cloud and infrastructure costs go to your provider directly. Amplitude operates the pipeline. You operate your client integration.
Compliance posture Data stays in infrastructure you control. EU data residency is automatic if you deploy in an EU region. Events are processed by a third party. DPA, sub-processor list, regional hosting all apply.

Raw events vs aggregated product analytics

Amplitude is built around the idea that events are most useful once they've been organized into product-analytics concepts: users, sessions, cohorts, funnels, retention. The platform's value comes from the layer above raw events — the way it turns a stream into insight without an engineer in the loop.

Rawbbit is built around the idea that raw events should outlive whatever you're analyzing today. The pipeline preserves the original event shape in Parquet, partitioned by date, in your storage. What you do downstream — whether that's BigQuery dashboards, ad-hoc SQL, ML feature stores, or sending a subset onward to a product analytics tool — is open.

If your work depends on the cohort-and-funnel layer being immediately available without engineering effort, Amplitude is the right shape. If your work depends on the raw layer being durable, portable, and queryable on your own terms, that's Rawbbit.

When Rawbbit is the better fit

  • You want raw events landed in your own object storage as Parquet — not as exports from a third party.
  • Your team already has SQL and warehouse capability and can build the analytics layer on top of raw events.
  • EU data residency or contractual control over the data plane is a requirement.
  • You want the pipeline runtime to be open source and inspectable.
  • You expect event volume to grow fast and want costs proportional to your infrastructure spend, not to a per-event SaaS price.
  • You're already using BigQuery (or want to be) and prefer one canonical warehouse over a separate analytics silo.

When Amplitude is the better fit

  • Your team is not data-engineering-led and you need product analytics that work the day you turn them on.
  • You need visual cohort builders, funnels, and retention dashboards without writing SQL.
  • Built-in A/B testing and experimentation tooling is part of your workflow.
  • You'd rather pay a SaaS bill than operate ingestion and storage yourself.
  • Your team is small enough that adding any operational ownership of analytics infrastructure is not the right tradeoff.

Which one should you choose?

A short framework based on team composition and stage, not feature checklists.

Choose Rawbbit when

  • You have a data engineer or technical founder who can own the stack.
  • You're already on BigQuery or planning to be, and want raw events to land there as a portable layer.
  • EU data residency or strict data sovereignty is non-negotiable.
  • You want analytics infrastructure that doesn't lock you into one vendor's data model.
  • You expect growth that would make per-event SaaS pricing painful within 12-18 months.

Choose Amplitude when

  • Your primary analytics users are product managers and growth analysts, not engineers.
  • You're early enough that an event volume cap on a SaaS tool isn't a real constraint yet.
  • Your team doesn't include anyone who would own a self-hosted pipeline.
  • You need answers in the UI today, and SQL-via-warehouse adds friction your team doesn't have time for.

Migration outline

  1. Keep Amplitude running. The first goal is parity, not cutover.
  2. Add the Rawbbit pipeline (collector-api, NATS JetStream, raw-writer, object storage) inside your cloud account.
  3. Add a Rawbbit SDK call alongside your existing Amplitude SDK call in the client. Events go to both — Amplitude continues to serve product analytics, Rawbbit starts building your raw archive.
  4. Verify parity in BigQuery: query the raw Parquet layer and compare counts and shapes against Amplitude's export or UI.
  5. Decide what to do with Amplitude. Some teams keep it as the product-analytics layer and use Rawbbit for the raw archive plus warehouse work. Others migrate dashboards into Metabase or similar and drop Amplitude. Both are valid.

FAQ

Does Rawbbit replace Amplitude's product analytics UI?

No. Rawbbit is a raw event pipeline, not a product analytics UI. If your team relies on visual cohort builders and prebuilt funnel views, you'll either keep using Amplitude for that layer or rebuild equivalent views in a BI tool like Metabase on top of the raw data.

Can I run Rawbbit and Amplitude in parallel?

Yes, and this is the recommended migration path. Your client sends each event to both endpoints; Amplitude continues to serve your existing dashboards while Rawbbit builds your raw archive in your own infrastructure. You can keep both running indefinitely or cut Amplitude later once you're confident in the new setup.

What about cohort analysis and funnels in Rawbbit?

Cohorts and funnels are SQL queries on raw events. With raw events in BigQuery via the external table, any cohort or funnel that Amplitude can express can be written as SQL — and visualized in Metabase or a similar tool. The tradeoff is that the SQL is your responsibility, where Amplitude provides a UI.

Is Rawbbit open source like Amplitude's exports?

Rawbbit is open source under Apache 2.0. The full pipeline — collector, raw writer, deploy scaffolding, the starter SQLMesh project — is on GitHub and inspectable. Amplitude is a closed platform with various export options.

Talk to us about migrating

If you are evaluating analytics alternatives, we can help you move to a portable raw-data-first setup.

See pricing details